Follow us for updates
© 2022 reportr.world
Read the Story →

Homophobic Slurs Prompt Supreme Court to Suspend Manila Judge

Conduct unbecoming of a judge.
by Erwin Colcol
2 hours ago
Photo/s: Stock photo
Shares

The Supreme Court has suspended a Manila trial court judge for work-related sexual harassment after making homophobic slurs against litigants in his court.

In an 18-page decision, the high court found Presiding Judge Jorge Emmanuel Lorredo of the Manila Metropolitan Trial Court Branch 26 liable for his "homophobic remarks", suspending him for 30 days ordering him to pay a fine of P50,000.

READ: How to be a Good Ally to the LGBTQIA+ Community

The ruling stemmed from the complaint filed by litigants Marcelino Espejon and Erickson Cabonita in 2019 alleging that at a preliminary conference, Lorredo showed bias and partiality by persistently asking them about their sexual orientation and telling them that homosexuality is a "sin."

The court quoted Lorredo as saying: "pagka-bading, tomboy, lesbian, ayaw ng Diyos yun.... So pag meron kang lesbian relationship, paparusahan yung anak mo."

Such remarks constitute homophobic slurs "which have no place in our courts of law," the Supreme Court said as it found Lorredo in violation of the New Code of Judicial Conduct.

Continue reading below ↓

The code requires judges to ensure equal treatment of everyone before the courts and to understand diversity arising from race, sex, religion, age, sexual orientation, and social and economic status, among others.

Lorredo's remarks were also found to be in violation of the Administrative Disciplinary Rules on Sexual Harassment Cases applicable to all officials and employees of the government, where work-related sexual harassment is committed in acts that further cause discrimination, insecurity, discomfort, offense or humiliation.

The Supreme Court also found that Lorredo, who admitted to have handed down decisions on 101 cases citing the Bible, allowed his religious feeling to interfere with his judicial functions in the complainants' case, leading the court to state that he failed to act not only with impartiality but to appear impartial.

The court reminded judges to avoid not only impropriety but the appearance of impropriety, and to ensure that they are seen by the public as guided by the law and not their personal or religious beliefs.

Continue reading below ↓
Recommended Videos

ALSO READ:

How #YesToSOGIEBill Benefits Everyone, Not Just LGBT

Probe Sought on Alleged Sexual Abuse in PH High School for the Arts

Reportr is now on Quento. Download the app or visit the Quento website for more articles and videos from Reportr and your favorite websites.

Latest Headlines
Read Next
Recent News
For both local and international destinations.
With the reopening of several local destinations, this app has never been more timely.
The chemical is not added in Lucky Me! products, it said.
The news. So what? Subscribe to the newsletter that explains what the news means for you.
The email address you entered is invalid.
Thank you for signing up to On Three, reportr's weekly newsletter delivered to your mailbox three times a week. Only the latest, most useful and most insightful reads.
By signing up to reportr.world newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.